![]() ![]() In 2022, a few years and one pandemic later, we are back. The report clearly demonstrated that most toolsets were failing to deliver on those demands most engineers were frustratingly tied to out-of-date software, running on hardware that was already below spec. It was the absence of such tools that led us to publish the original State of Thermal report, which surveyed 117 professional thermal engineers using any of nine different platforms. We want simple, consistent thermal simulation software that can deliver rapid-fire results, from which we can draw accurate conclusions. It’s no surprise then, that thermal engineers value ease above all else. That’s inescapably difficult, often reflected as such in thermal simulation software at large. You are attempting to simulate a specific instance of the Earth’s atmosphere and wrap those conditions around a bespoke product. There are hundreds, if not thousands, of potential variables for every simulation. Thermal simulation is inherently a complex exercise. Wherever we are, we want tasks to be as stress-free and intuitive as possible. The solution to overcomplication has always been simplicity. State of Thermal 2022: Growth, Speed, and the Cloud ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |